Overview

TRANSPORTPLANERING

Row

Publications in DiVA 2020
(fractional counts)

14.3

WoS coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

76.4 %

Scopus coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

91 %

Row

Notes more…

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Overall Web of Science coverage for peer reviewed publications in this unit is good, 76.4%.

Note that the coverage numbers for Web of Science and Scopus apply to publications in the KTH bibliometric database Bibmet. If a WoS-id or Scoupus-id from DiVA can not be matched in Bibmet, it does not count as covered.

Row

Background

The bibliometric indicators referred are based on publications registered in DiVA. Only publications from currently employed researchers at KTH are included. The rolling nature of this report means that it provides more of a current overview and less of a historic stable trend, since it excludes publications written by researchers that are no longer affiliated to KTH, but have been at some point in time.

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Row

Researchers at the unit

Publication data is available only after login.

Publications in DiVA

TRANSPORTPLANERING

Row

Fractional count

Publication volume, fractionalized

Publication volume, fractionalized

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 7.3 6.2 7.2 7.7 6.4 6.8 7.5 49.0 83.6% 1.0
Article, other NA 0.2 NA 0.5 NA 0.3 0.5 1.6 34.0% 0.9
Conference paper, peer review 6.8 3.1 0.9 4.2 2.8 2.5 2.1 22.4 60.8% 0.7
Conference paper, other 1.3 2.4 4.4 4.8 0.9 1.2 1.0 16.1 0.0% 0.0
Chapter in book NA 0.5 0.5 1.0 0.8 0.5 NA 3.3 0.0% 0.7
Report 1.3 1.2 1.2 0.7 1.8 1.2 1.2 8.5 0.0% 0.0
Doctoral thesis NA 1.0 1.0 NA NA NA NA 2.0 0.0% 0.0
Licentiate thesis NA NA 1.0 NA 1.0 4.0 2.0 8.0 0.0% 0.0

Full count

Publication volume, full count

Publication volume, full count

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 14 12 13 17 11 15 12 94 84.0% 1
Article, other NA 1 NA 1 NA 1 2 5 40.0% 1
Conference paper, peer review 10 6 3 8 5 5 5 42 66.7% 1
Conference paper, other 3 4 8 8 2 2 1 28 0.0% 0
Chapter in book NA 1 1 1 2 1 NA 6 0.0% 1
Report 2 2 2 1 3 2 2 14 0.0% 0
Doctoral thesis NA 1 1 NA NA NA NA 2 0.0% 0
Licentiate thesis NA NA 1 NA 1 4 2 8 0.0% 0

Row

Publication volume

Publication volume

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Citation impact

TRANSPORTPLANERING

Row

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 9.1 28.0 3.1 2.5 27.4%
2015 7.2 76.9 10.7 0.2 2.8%
2016 8.1 27.5 3.4 2.4 29.9%
2017 10.0 45.5 4.5 1.9 18.6%
2018 7.2 47.2 6.6 2.9 40.7%
Total 41.6 225.1 5.4 9.9 23.8%

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Cf Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 14.8 2.48 3.9 26.4%
2015-2017 16.3 2.40 3.8 23.1%
2016-2018 15.2 1.67 2.7 17.7%
2017-2019 16.7 1.51 2.7 16.3%
Total 31.5 1.96 6.6 21.0%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article, Proceedings paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 12 (full counted) publications with moderate Web of Science coverage (at least 64.6%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 33 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 83.7%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Average field normalized citations (Cf)

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal impact

TRANSPORTPLANERING

Row

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Journal Cf Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 14.8 1.53 7.2 48.6%
2015-2017 15.8 1.65 9.2 57.9%
2016-2018 14.8 1.47 6.6 44.9%
2017-2019 16.2 1.38 7.3 44.8%
2018-2020 16.9 1.37 7.7 45.9%
Total 36.6 1.47 17.9 49.0%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 31 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 81.4%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Field normalized journal impact (JCf)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

TRANSPORTPLANERING

Row

Summary

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

Publication years Publications Swedish non-university co-publications Share Swedish non-university International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 29 2 6.9% 21 72.4%
2015-2017 33 3 9.1% 25 75.8%
2016-2018 29 4 13.8% 22 75.9%
2017-2019 34 7 20.6% 24 70.6%
2018-2020 31 6 19.4% 20 64.5%
Total 72 10 13.9% 51 70.8%

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 29 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 81.6%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and Swedish non-university co‑publication

Countries and organizations

Co‑publication countries

Co‑publication countries

Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
Netherlands 36 36 0 0 0 20.8
United States 12 12 0 0 0 3.7
China 5 5 0 0 0 1.7
Finland 3 3 0 0 0 1.2
Slovak Republic 3 3 0 0 0 1.0
Germany 3 3 0 0 0 0.8
Luxembourg 2 2 0 0 0 0.6
France 2 1 1 0 0 0.3
Australia 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Austria 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Portugal 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
Belgium 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Singapore 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Spain 1 0 1 0 0 0.1

Co‑publication organizations

Co‑publication countries

Organization Organization type Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
Delft University of Technology University Netherlands 36 36 0 0 0 20.8
Northeastern University University United States 9 9 0 0 0 3.2
Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute Institute Sweden 6 6 0 0 0 1.9
iTekn Solutions Company Sweden 3 3 0 0 0 1.3
Linköping University University Sweden 4 4 0 0 0 1.3
Enjoyor Co., Ltd.  Company China 3 3 0 0 0 1.2
University of Zilina University Slovak Republic 3 3 0 0 0 1.0
NA NA Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 1.0
Scania AB Company Sweden 3 2 1 0 0 0.8
Aalto University University Finland 2 2 0 0 0 0.7
Ramboll Company Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.7
University of Luxembourg University Luxembourg 2 2 0 0 0 0.6
HSL NA Finland 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
University of Stuttgart University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Catholic University in Ružomberok (CU) University Slovak Republic 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Dortmund University of Technology University Germany 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
NEC Corporation Company Germany 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
Queensland University of Technology University Australia 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Slovak Academy of Sciences Other Public Slovak Republic 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Stockholm Reg Publ Transport Adm NA Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Stockholms läns landsting Other health services Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Sweco AB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna University Austria 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Porto University Portugal 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
Wuhan University of Technology University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology University United States 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
University of Massachusetts University United States 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
LogistikCentrum Göteborg AB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
VEDECOM Institute France 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
BEIJING JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Engineering Research Center of Intelligent Transport of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou Institute China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Stantec Company United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Central Florida University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Hong Kong University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Wuhan University University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Zhejiang University of Technology University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Hasselt University University Belgium 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Kreditech Holding SSL GmbH Company Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Solkompaniet Sverige AB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology University Singapore 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Applus+ IDIADA Company Spain 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
OFFIS - Institute for Information Technology Institute France 1 0 1 0 0 0.1

Open Access

TRANSPORTPLANERING

Row

Open Access publications, full counts

Open Access publications, full counts

Publication Year Publications Open Access publications OA gold OA hybrid OA green OA bronze Not OA Share OA
2014 24 8 3 0 4 1 16 33.3%
2015 16 4 2 0 2 0 12 25.0%
2016 17 13 4 0 9 0 4 76.5%
2017 24 16 6 3 6 1 8 66.7%
2018 19 8 4 1 2 1 11 42.1%
2019 18 10 3 1 6 0 8 55.6%
2020 16 9 4 4 1 0 7 56.2%
Total 134 68 26 9 30 3 66 50.7%

Row

Notes more…

The Open Access type of the publications was fetched from the Unpaywall REST API. The method to determine the OA type is presented here.

In summary, the different OA types can be described as follows:

  • Gold: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is fully OA.

  • Hybrid: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is not fully OA.

  • Green: The full text has been found in an institutional repository, such as DiVA.

  • Bronze: The full text has been found on a publisher website but no OA license could be identified.

N.B.: This table is based on peer-reviewed publications for which Unpaywall could determine the OA type (necessary condition: have a DOI number). Unpaywall’s method is empirical and does not strictly equate to copyright license. As a consequence, the OA status of a given publication may vary with time — for example turning from “Not OA” to “Green” when a full text is added to DiVA.

Row

Overview of Open Access publications - piechart

Stacked area chart for publications

Scopus

TRANSPORTPLANERING

Row

Citation Impact

Column

Citations, open window
Citations, open window
Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 13.1 186.1 14.2 1.0 7.6%
2015 7.2 398.9 55.7 0.2 2.8%
2016 8.1 122.1 15.1 0.0 0.0%
2017 11.4 163.2 14.4 1.5 13.5%
2018 8.9 100.1 11.3 1.5 16.9%
2019 7.8 42.2 5.4 0.7 9.0%
2020 9.6 72.4 7.5 0.9 9.5%
Total 66.0 1085.0 16.4 5.8 8.9%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Conference Paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 15 (full counted) publications with moderate Scopus coverage (at least 74.9%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Average field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Publication years Publications Average FWCI Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 27.2 2.19 9.5 34.8%
2015-2017 24.9 2.48 10.5 42.0%
2016-2018 26.8 1.64 7.9 29.6%
2017-2019 26.5 1.47 5.6 21.1%
Total 53.7 1.83 15.0 28.0%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 54 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 88.6%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal Impact

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Publication years Publications Average SNIP Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 23.6 1.54 16.1 68.0%
2015-2017 22.3 1.58 16.2 72.7%
2016-2018 21.7 1.52 15.0 69.1%
2017-2019 21.8 1.73 15.6 71.6%
2018-2020 23.0 1.90 15.9 69.0%
Total 54.4 1.69 37.4 68.8%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 49 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 88.6%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Field normalized journal impact (SNIP)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
Publication years Publications Corporate co-publications Share corporate International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 54 2 3.7% 26 48.1%
2015-2017 55 2 3.6% 30 54.5%
2016-2018 55 1 1.8% 31 56.4%
2017-2019 58 6 10.3% 34 58.6%
2018-2020 49 6 12.2% 31 63.3%
Total 127 9 7.1% 69 54.3%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 49 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 92.5%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and corporate co‑publication

About

Row